I repaired them and they were absolute bargains for what I paid for them. The last Seek Reveal cameras that I bought were faulty standard and XR models in Fast Fame and <9fps variants. It could have come straight off the set of Star Trek I went on to buy a used but ‘as new’ Seek Reveal Pro <9fps model. ![]() I was attracted to the Reveal by its very nice case design and decent imaging performance. I bought the Seek Reveal PRO FastFrame model at a very good discount and consider it to be a very neat and capable little ‘budget’ camera. My only previous experience of Seek Thermal cameras was their original MK1 Dongle and it was not a very happy experience so I rehomed it. I was pleasantly surprised by its imaging performance considering its cost. I own the seek Reveal series of cameras and only decided to buy one after using a standard Seek Reveal while visiting a friend. I have also wondered why the Seek Shot did not appear to be more popular. ![]() Here’s some differences between Pro/Non-Pro, besides the resolution/FOV: (non-pro)-quick-review/ I kinda wonder why they don’t get popular on this forum, I think they have good performance/price ratio, and are general purpose TICs, without ITAR. Bad Although the bugs listing are longer in text length, I still consider them as good products, especially for the price. On device analysis and post processing for still pictures. Minimum auto range is only 1 Kelvin, which makes contrast much better than Flir’s 4 Kelvin. ![]() The “performance/cost/size” triangle is good enough. Good Self-contained, do not need a phone or a host like a dongle. Here is a quick personal review about Seek Shot Series, for anyone interested.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |